Abstract

This paper introduces the Modular Artificial Specialized Intelligence (MASI) framework, a distributed cognitive architecture designed to address the safety, transparency, and governability limitations of monolithic foundation models. MASI decouples reasoning into four canonical, independently operational roles—Wisdom, Foresight, Empathy, and Precision—coordinated through a standardized communication layer known as the MASI Bus. The framework enforces a Consult-Before-Execute (CBE) protocol, requiring multi-perspective verification, drift detection, and ethical arbitration prior to any system output or tool execution. This deliberative process is quantified via the MASI Trust Score ($T_{masi}$), a dynamic metric integrating fairness, logic, and uncertainty into a verifiable audit artifact. Additionally, the paper defines a decentralized governance structure (MASI DAO) and an economic incentive model (Modular Contribution Credits) to foster an interoperable, safety-aligned ecosystem. We present the technical specifications, schema definitions, and failure-containment logic required to implement MASI as a robust standard for institutional intelligence.

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Tool-Calling vs. Fixed Cycle Models.pdf (328 kB)
Appendix A: Tool Calling versus Fixed Cycle Models

AI Ethical Failure Case Study Analysis.pdf (272 kB)
Appendix B: Ai Ethical Failure Case Study Analysis

AI Interoperability_ Technical Barriers.pdf (322 kB)
Appendix C: Ai Interoperability Technical Barriers

AI Regulatory Fragmentation Costs and Savings.pdf (271 kB)
Appendix D: Ai Regulatory Fragmentation Costs and Savings

Continuous Monitoring Cost Reduction.pdf (311 kB)
Appendix E: Continuous Monitoring Cost Reduction

Formalizing Moral, Emotional, Wisdom Modules.pdf (296 kB)
Appendix F: Formalizing Moral, Emotional, Wisdom Modules

Multi-Agent Framework Communication Protocols.pdf (268 kB)
Appendix G: Multi-Agent Framework Communication Protocols

Quantifiable AI Trustworthiness Metrics.pdf (247 kB)
Appendix H: Quantifiable Ai Trustworthiness Metrics

Quantifying Adaptive Agent Role Rotation.pdf (293 kB)
Appendix I: Quantifying Adaptive Agent Role Rotation

Quantifying AI Energy Efficiency Gains.pdf (256 kB)
Appendix J: Quantifying Ai Energy Efficiency Gains

Quantifying Modular Safety Gains.pdf (260 kB)
Appendix K: Quantifying Modular Safety Gains

Technology Consortium Success Metrics Model.pdf (270 kB)
Appendix L: Technology Consortium Success Metrics Model

Share

COinS